The decision concluded that the state law limiting marriage to different-sex couples violated sections of the constitution that required due process and equal protection of the laws.The court did not require the state to allow same-sex couples to marry, but mandated the creation of a civil union status that would provide all the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples.Democrats who feared the impact of having the legislation on the November ballot helped override his veto.One Democratic leader in the House said: "I'll vote to override.If you'd like to share it with us so you can take advantage of Facebook Login, you can update your Facebook permissions to give us access to your email.If not, you can always sign up for a Groupon account without using Facebook.
The bill was reported out of the committee by a 4-3 vote.I'll stand up and say it's a bad bill, but it's even worse to have this issue on the ballot." According to the Seattle Times: "Lawmakers, eager to be done with the controversial issue, rushed the ban through in minutes and dumped it in the governor's lap. Then both houses voted summarily to override the veto.No one could remember the last time a bill was passed, vetoed and overridden within hours–with almost no discussion and no debate." Hara refused, and Singer and Barwick brought suit on the grounds that the denial violated the Equal Rights Amendment of the state constitution.Opponents mounted a challenge that required voters to approve the statute at a referendum, which they did on November 6.The law took effect on December 6, and the first marriages were celebrated on December 9.